Family Madness

'Spittin' chips' is what we call it in the Tavern. A chap propping up the bar gets 'annoyed' shall we say, at something he hears. Well we had chips spat all over the place when a Judge came in for a pre-dinner swift one. It was his retirement.

Thankfully his Dinner with his Legal mates was to be elsewhere as after what he was saying in the bar made a lot of folks quite happy to see him go. He told all around:

Allegations of child sexual abuse are being increasingly invented by mothers to stop fathers from seeing their children.

As if we didn't know. 

Justice David Collier was retiring from Parramatta Family Court at the end of the month after 14 years on the bench,. He says he sees unprecedented hostility infiltrating the Family Court, and a willingness by parents to use their children to damage one another.

Unprecedented?

"Has he just seen that?", asked one regular. "Crikey, we've known that for donkey's years".

”If a husband and wife really get down to it in this day and age, dirt flies,” Justice Collier said. 

The worst are those mothers who direct false allegations of abuse against former partners. 

”When you have heard the evidence, you realise that this is a person who’s so determined to win that he or she will say anything. I’m satisfied that a number of people who have appeared before me have known that it is one of the ways of completely shutting husbands out of the child’s life. 

”It’s a horrible weapon.”

 

http://www.familylawexpress.com.au/news/children/childabuse/falseallegations-childabuse/false-abuse-claims-are-the-new-court-weapon-retiring-judge-says/1762/

 

'Justice' Collier

 

Not that Justice Collier would tell us exactly WHAT he has done about it.

Nothing to tell.

"Friggin' tell me about it" said one increasingly angry dad. "I tried telling a Judge and he banged me up". 

Such cases are fraught for Family Court judges. Once an allegation has been made it is impossible to ignore.  NOT. The court must deem whether there is an ”unacceptable risk” of abuse occurring in the father’s care.

And of course they always do. No evidence is needed. Judges Rules. The FATHER is hammered. Almost every time.

"Sometimes the allegations are obviously fabricated, other times they are probably true". 

Probably?

Probably ?

A Father can lose his children and his home on the basis of a 'probably'.

What ever happened to 'Beyond all Reasonable Doubt'?

”It’s that grey area in the middle that you lose sleep over at night, and you do lose sleep,” Justice Collier said. 

”They’re difficult to disprove. The allegation lingers there.”  

The grey area is in between your ears, judge.

Isn't a Court a place where the highly paid people are supposed to find the truth?  Beyond reasonable doubt if such intense punishment is to be handed out?

What do they think their $300,000 a year is for?

His Dinner guest Barrister Esther Lawson, who sits on the family law committee at the NSW Bar Association, said, anecdotally, there appeared to be an increase in allegations of sexual abuse coming before the court, but the reasons were unclear.

Is she stupid?

Unclear.

Its because mothers CAN make false Allegations and the Courts WILL NOT charge them with Perjury. Duh !!

They all know it. The lawyers even, 'anecdotally', coach the mothers to do it.

They collude and conspire with the mothers to make the False Allegations knowing that nothing will go against them.

She fatuously warned that the consequence of false allegations could return to haunt the accuser, including the loss of time with their children.

But that is only Fathers she is talking about.
 

”Clearly there are cases where there is reliable evidence that sexual abuse has taken place and these matters need to be properly ventilated,” Ms Lawson said.

 ”But if the court finds that allegations have been maliciously motivated then there may be potential consequences, including a change in the child’s primary residence.”

Yep. To the Mother, regardless. 

Mothers rarely ever have the children taken from her even when there is clear, incontrovertible evidence that she lied. And who is more likely to abuse children? Even kill them? Or is one sort of abuse OK when a mother does it but not when dad does?

A mother can be in jail for murder and her babies will still be given to her and not the father.

It is rare for Family Court judges to speak publicly about their views. Many simply do not want any light shone on what happens on their watch. Newspapers and TV are forbidden to report on matters in the Family Court.

INJUSTICE IS NOT ALLOWED

TO BE SEEN.

”There is a lot of venom. A mother declares she lives a chaste and modest life and then on Facebook says, ‘Guess what I did last night’, and Dad’s only too happy to put it before you.”

Yes. That is called evidence. It should be put before the Court. But when from a dad, evidence is 'venom'.

The Judge  puts much of the venom down to a generation of people more assertive of their rights, and now entering relationships. He totally overlooks the clear fact that the Secret Star Chamber that is the Family Court has actively CAUSED the problem.

Personally as a Tavern Keeper I put a lot of the venom down to what Judges drink. It ain't the wholesome wine that an Angel shape brings. It is wicca-juice concocted by feminist witches in the woods.

Men asserting their rights are treated as 'aggressive'

and that is used as a 'suspicion' of 'possible future abuse'.

But the poor Judge was disheartened  to leave the court after a satisfying career. He didn't speak up before while he was taking the taxpayers' money. His pension is safe though.

He used to keep a magic wand, apparently, he told us, which he has now passed on to his colleague Justice Bill Johnson.

”I wished I could wave that magic wand and say, ‘Be nice to each other’,” Justice Collier said. ”That’s the only order I would have to make.”

The Judge was off with the faeries.

Our Bouncer helped him on his way. 

That set off some of the other regulars. The Lads from A.M spoke up. One was spittin' the chips alright.

"This new age feminit divorce malice is the new base level that wimyn live down to! Why ! because they can.

 The past forty years of comprehensive feminit brainwashing from the cradle to the grave in the westrern democracies have armed such wimyn with the fixed notion they 

have the right to do just what ever they want to

as in the end they delegate their mess to butthead; and do, in the star chamber Family Courts by order.

 That judge even alluded to this in as much when he said the courts will take into account any malicious allegation by the divorcing cupcake - and they sure do; even the female barrister Esther Lawson reinforced his comments.  

 in Australia this shift in male female relations occurred in 1972 when the new age collectivists headed by Whitlam and the so called Labour Government introduced the Family Law legislation which set up single mothers pensions for feckless wimyn and easy divorce for wimyn - Hubby get the shaft and Wifey gets the gold mine 

 Of course all the wimyn want is the kids, the car, the house, his old age retirement nest egg and maintenance instalments into perpetuity then anything else not nailed down or chained to the wall and then just a little more, but not him 

Well, he made his point so strongly I had to hook him up to some orange juice.

David edged his bit in too:

Western family law is Boshevik family law that was implemented by Lenin in Russia in 1917 with the stated aim of destroying the family.  

No fault divorce is intended to destroy the family and it was very effective in Russia. So effective that Stalin banned it in 1936. This system of family law is first described in the communist manifesto where no fault divorce and children being raised by the state is clearly documented.

A chap came in from Outdoors, a Canadian chap, and he put his chopper in too.

All my sources keep pointing to the fact that a father living in the home is far more likely to PREVENT all forms of child abuse.

 What is happening through the demonization of men and fathers and their subsequent removal from the home is a freaking FIELD DAY for the pedophile controllers in government and private childcare facilities. 

 From my own history (which was fortunately solved through non violence) I have no doubt that I would KILL anyone who laid an inappropriate finger on my son or daughter. Brings out my "inner sadist". Horrifying of course but probably true. If someone touches my son or daughter? Or future grandson/granddaughter? I'd enjoy hurting them. Be worth the jail sentence frankly. 

I had to remind him of the need to find forgiveness even when exacting retribution. It looks as though one day we are all going to need lorry-loads of both. 

 Paedophiles know this of course and thus must work to weaken the father's influence in the family.

 Think of a liaison between paedophiles and government. One following in the footsteps of feminism which sought to push BOTH parents out of the home. The father through untrue smears on men and the corrupt family court. The mom by making her think that marriage was holding her back and intimidating her into the workplace with the vulnerable kids thrown into day care.

Then he mumbled something about reading it somewhere.

I reckon we got through 10 barrels just to calm them all down.

And the Judge and Mz Lawson? They will find our Bouncer, a Gentleman of Muscle and Guile, standing at the door blocking their path.

They will have to have a well crafted confession, repentance and a means of undoing all the evil they have wreaked before any sort of forgiveness or fine drink is given to them.