Anguish in the main bar today. Grim faces. Yea, even unto Righteous anger. The world outside is a dark place and getting darker as it plunges ever further into destroying the Sacrament of Marriage.
The 'Gay's just want to have the same 'Rights' as everyone else. Apparently they think their 'normal' is everyone else's normal. But it is far from it.
* (Just a small issue here. Gays have exactly the same marriage 'rights' as anyone else. They are quite free to marry an opposite sex person of their choice, just as heterosexuals can.)
In some places Gays can now 'Marry' a same-sex person and adopt children. Where they still cannot, they can buy them. But what do they want children for, do you think? To raise as Good people? Rotten apples cannot enhance the health of a barrel-full of 'normal ones.
‘‘Being a father was an honour and a privilege that amounted to the best six years of my life,’’
Newton, 42, told the court."
Sure. But he was not a father. He did not 'Honour' and he stole a privilege.
He Bought a Child.
He was allowed to buy a child.
By our increasingly perverted, 'progressive' Society.
What a mother ! She used her body for monetary gain just as any prostitute would and sold the baby she produced. Not a thought for the child's Soul, nor her own.Standing before an American court convicted of the most heinous of child sex crimes, the double lives of Australian citizen Mark J. Newton and his long-term boyfriend Peter Truong were laid bare.Moments later Newton was sentenced to 40 years in prison for sexually abusing the boy he and Truong, 36 from Queensland, had ‘‘adopted’’ after paying a Russian woman $8000 to be their surrogate in 2005.
The pair had adopted the boy ‘‘for the sole purpose of exploitation’’.
But what does Society expect. Happy Families? Healthy people? The society that denigrates real fathers and families, and takes children away from really normal loving fathers who sacrifice for their children, also created this travesty of 'Gay Marriage', allowing sex-obsessed homosexuals to adopt children and even BUY them .The abuse began just days after his birth and over six years the couple travelled the world, offering him up for sex with at least eight men, recording the abuse and uploading the footage to an international syndicate known as the Boy Lovers Network.‘‘Personally .. I think this is probably the worst [paedophile] rings ... if not the worst ring I’ve ever heard of,’’ investigator Brian Bone of the US Postal Inspection Service told reporters outside the US federal court room in Indiana.
JUST WHAT DOES A 'PROGRESSIVE' SOCIETY EXPECT TO HAPPEN?
US District Judge Sarah Evans Barker said the pair deserved a harsher punishment but were tried at district court level to avoid subjecting a jury to the repulsive images that had been produced.‘‘What can be said? What can be done to erase some of the horror of this?’’ Judge Barker said in handing down her sentence.
Well, for a start, Lady, YOU can stop the enabling. YOU can stop facilitating this evil. Have you never heard of 'Bolting the Stable Door' after the horse has gone? It is not as though a 'normal' person cannot see a disaster waiting to happen.
I am sure their personalities were well matched. Prostitute mother, baby-seller, and a baby-buying Homosexual pederast. What a lovely couple. Blessed in Hell.Newton and Truong gave an interview to a local ABC reporter in Far North Queensland in 2010 on their battle to have a child as a gay couple. Their search started in 2002 in the US, where they both were working, and when they did not have any success Truong travelled to Russia and found a woman who they ‘‘clicked with personality-wise’’. She was paid $8000 and, as per their agreement, granted the couple sole custody of the boy, handing him over five days after his birth in 2005.
The Police of course now must treat Homosexuals as though they are 'normal'. Otherwise they might 'offend' them.The family planned to live in Cairns but that was delayed because Australian authorities initially refused to grant the child a visa. That took 2 years and upon their eventual arrival in Australia they said Customs quizzed them for hours. Police were also sent to the family’s house in Cairns to check up on the pair.
But of course now the 'authorities' do not permit anyone to be 'concerned'. That would be 'Discrimination'.In the radio interview, 20 months before their arrest, Newton was asked if he felt the extra attention was because authorities suspected there was ‘‘something dodgy ... something paedophlic going on here?’’‘‘Absolutely, absolutely, I’m sure that was completely the concern,’’ Newton replied.
Evidence before the court revealed the abuse began before the couple returned to Australia. One video is said to show Newton performing a sex act on the boy when he was less than two weeks old.
Yes. And the Homosexual lobby, to which Governments seem to kow-tow, does see sexual abuse as 'normal', just so long as Homosexuals do it, Family Courts do it and the Legislators themselves do it. For is not the deliberate destruction of marriage and fatherhood and motherhood and the trafficking of children not abuse?Judge Barker said the pair brainwashed the child to believe the sexual abuse was normal. Newton was also said to have trained the boy to deny any inappropriate behaviour if he was ever questioned by authorities.
UPDATENewton and Truong claimed they were being targeted because they were homosexual.
Bill came into the bar and had a LOT to say:
Indeed, consider this: our ABC actually strongly promoted this very same homosexual couple just a few years ago. The GayBC is among the most pro-homosexual media outlets in existence in this country. They gave this couple plenty of airplay and newsfeed.
Their “moving” story was played out on the radio, on television, the Internet, and in newspapers. And the ABC was up to its ears in all this. For example on 14 July, 2010 they ran with this story:
“Two dads are better than one”. It began as follows:
“Becoming parents was hard work for gay couple, Pete and Mark but they'd do it all over again if they had to.A shiny child's bike lies on its side on the front lawn of an immaculate garden. Around the back gay dads Pete and Mark chase their son's pet chickens around, trying to catch them. Drake, 5, exclaims that the little birds are too fast for him.“It's a happy, relaxed family scene. But it wasn't an easy road to get there. After many hurdles Drake was born by surrogacy in Russia. ‘We decided that we would have a child, that it was time for us to have a family. We wanted to experience the joys of fatherhood and we started our surrogacy over in the United States back in 2002,’ Pete said.”
In typical lamestream media style, this story is designed to pull all the emotional heart strings, and make anyone opposed to it look like a callous and heartless ogre. Personal interest stories are always used by the activist MSM. Contrary facts and evidence can easily be overcome by simply showing a happy “family”. Emotive stories will always trump rational argument and evidence-based debate.
The ABC in particular and the MSM in general do this constantly. It is a way to short circuit debate, and put the homosexual activists in the best possible light.
Of course they will never show the opposite. They will never feature lengthy stories with big colour pics about children who have been harmed in homosexual households. They will never do personal interest stories which may cast homosexuality in a bad light.
It is only and always positive spin from the media lapdogs of the homosexual lobbyists. And this story fit the description to a T.
The ABC puff piece ends this way:
“On arrival in Australia customs quizzed Mark and Pete for hours. Police were also sent around to their house on a Sunday morning to investigate. ‘When people see two guys together, you know it's like, 'Where's his mother?' We've had a lot of people ask that,’ Pete said. ‘I think that even if one of us was a woman, we wouldn't have had the same suspicions and problems that we went through.’“Thinking back to the police visit, Pete said the police seemed to want reassurance that the situation was 'right'. They checked if the couple had equipment to raise a child like a bed, clothes and bottles. Mark said he's sure that they were under suspicion of paedophilia. But despite the difficulties, he said the couple would do it again with no hesitation. ‘We're a family just like any other family,’ he said with pride.”
Yep, a happy family just like any other. Oh, and the ABC has now pulled this article from their website. It says this at the site: “The page you are looking for,
‘http://www.abc.net.au/local/stories/2010/07/14/2953694.htm’ cannot be found. It might have been removed, had its name changed, or be temporarily unavailable.” I wonder why. But fortunately it has been preserved. I have the entire piece for those who are interested.Yes. Bill is right and we HAVE to target Homosexuals. They must not be beyond suspicion on the pretext that such would be 'Discrimination'. It is amongst homosexuals that we find Paedophiles.
Normal People are not Homosexual nor are they Paedophiles.
After his arrest in February 2011, Truong gave investigators the password to the computer hard drives police had seized. It detailed the years of abuse.
OK, so this *may* be the extreme. Some would argue that most Homosexual men can make good parents. That paedophiles are rare.
Yes they are rare, but even rarer are heterosexual paedophiles.
The Family Court uses the *Precautionary Principle* to separate biological fathers from their children, under suspicion from the most blatant false allegations but rarely mothers under suspicion.
And what of female homosexuals? Lesbians. There are far more females 'given' children by the Family Court especially and many *single-mothers* are lesbian. Can they make good parents?
The *test* is the outcomes for children and for society. Let's see.
Our *Progressive* society is building a huge Pit for the next generation.
Many stiff drinks in the bar, even at lunchtime. Bad tastes in the mouth need washing out.