Friday, January 19, 2018

Table 34

The best table in the Tavern's restaurant is right up against a picture window that affords wonderful views. That is if you care to gaze through it into the distance and see the detail. But many privileged customers just glance through from time to time and miss the 'meaning' of the great creation which can be seen. It is Table #34 if you book and ask for it.  

There is another table 34 which needs a good look through too and we had it brought to our attention a few days ago. (I know. I've been busy !!) The view is of filth and dismay.
Look at the meaning behind the numbers.
We live in a period when our children are exposed to filth, perversion and AgitProp even in school, taught by perverts, mainly female, and paid-for through our taxes. 

Our Universities provide the 'data' and information packages to help these perverted teacher-drones, devised by women and men (it ain't all women, see) with PhDs in strange 'studies' which are soul-curses.  But they are not new and follow in the footsteps of an eralier era of persuasive perverts who poisoned the academic world. We got a whiff of their stench here and had to fumigate afterwards. But the exposure was worth it.

Oz schools have been infiltrated by perverts and paedophiles. I would say Criminals. Our civil society is falling down under the high heels of transvestite homosexuals. 

Our institution of marriage and the entire concept of an adult man and woman being the only sound sexual union has been severely damaged in the past few months, largely because our political elite are either too ignorant of the truth or they are conspirators with the perverts. Our politicians are Criminal too.

Even our Churches are rife with homosexual clergy. What a horror they have let loose upon children.

Research scientist Gordon Muir, MD kicked it off. He had mentioned...
The understanding that we have of childhood sexuality and normal childhood sexual development as it is believed and taught in academia today comes from the experimental evidence documented in Kinsey's report published in 1948 with the childhood sexuality tables that we have just discussed. **It is absolutely astonishing that this is taken as the basis of what we understand to be normal childhood sexual development.** And when I try to explain this to colleagues in the type of science I'm involved with in what I call the harder sciences of biology or medicine, statistics, immunology, **they do not believe what I'm trying to tell them**. And the only way I can convince them of the truth of this is to go to the library, pull off the shelf of Alfred Kinsey's books and show them what is inside. And it's quite shocking.
He continued: 
(Kinsey) provided the "scientific" basis for (pedophilia). **He felt the main problem with adult-child sexual relations was hysteria and over-reaction on the part of parents and authorities.** His co-author Wardell Pomeroy, a prominent sexologist has written that the Kinsey research uncovered, "many beautiful and satisfying relationships between fathers and daughters." Pomeroy also in his sex-education book "Boys and Sex" refers to the possibility of "loving sexual relationships between children and animals". -Gordon Muir, MD
Jonathon van Maren had a bit to say too, because you are unlikely to go to the library as Dr Muir suggests. 
Most people have no idea who Alfred Kinsey really was and how his so-called research was actually performed. I myself first heard of Alfred Kinsey in the first year of my history degree at university, where my professor announced that there “was no Sexual Revolution at all”—because the Kinsey Reports proved that people had been engaging in all sorts of bizarre and criminal sexual behaviors all along.
The real story is horrifying. It is stomach-churning. But it is also crucial that we know how, exactly, we got to this place in our culture of such sexual nihilism. 
Alfred Kinsey was a pervert and a sex criminal
He is known as “The Father of the Sexual Revolution,” and if you’ve ever taken a university course on 20th century history, you’ll have heard his name: Alfred Kinsey.

Kinsey was not only the “father” of the Sexual Revolution, he set the stage for the massive social and cultural upheaval of the ‘60s, ‘70s and ‘80s with his 1948 Sexual Behavior in the Human Male and his 1953 Sexual Behavior in the Human Female.
These books revealed to a shocked and somewhat titillated population (we are so easily tittified when we ought to have been terrified.) things they had never known about themselves: That between 30-45% of men had affairs, 85% of men had had sex prior to marriage, that a staggering 70% of men had slept with prostitutes, and that between 10 and 37% of men had engaged in homosexual behavior.
Pretty well all of Kinsey's 'findings' is sheer Bollox. 
Much less talked about were his other disturbing “findings”— an in-depth study on the “sexual behavior” of children, as well as claims that nearly 10% of men had performed sex acts with animals (as well as 3.6% of women), and that this number rose to between 40-50% based on proximity to farms.
Kinsey’s research portrayed people as amoral and sex-driven, and is credited as fundamentally changing the way our culture views sex.
But was he right?
To begin with, the integrity of much of his work has long since been called into question: among his questionable practices, Kinsey encouraged those he was working with to engage in all types of sexual activity as a form of research, misrepresented single people as married, and hugely over represented incarcerated sex criminals and prostitutes in his data.
But beyond this is the simple fact that Kinsey himself was a pervert and a sex criminal.
For example, where did he get all of his data on the “sexual behavior of children”? 
The answer is nothing short of chilling. 
Dr. Judith Reisman (whose research has since been confirmed time and time again) explained in her ground-breaking work Sex, Lies and Kinsey that Kinsey facilitated brutal sexual abuse to get his so-called research:
Kinsey solicited and encouraged pedophiles, at home and abroad, to sexually violate from 317 to 2,035 infants and children for his alleged data on normal “child sexuality.” 
Many of the crimes against children (oral and anal sodomy, genital intercourse and manual abuse) committed for Kinsey’s research are quantified in his own graphs and charts.
For example, “Table 34” on page 180 of Kinsey’s “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male” claims to be a “scientific” record of “multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males.” Here, infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for “orgasm” by Kinsey’s “technically trained” aides, with one four-year-old tested 24 consecutive hours for an alleged 26 “orgasms.” 
Sex educators, pedophiles and their advocates commonly quote these child “data” to prove children’s need for homosexual, heterosexual and bisexual satisfaction via “safe-sex” education. These data are also regularly used to “prove” children are sexual from birth.
The man heralded with enthusiasm by mainstream publications such as Time and Life Magazine was nothing less than a monstrous facilitator of child-rape. 
In fact, he even went so far as to record children shrieking and thrashing in pain, passing out and convulsing as the result of the hellish abuse he was putting them through, as evidence of “orgasm”—especially for children who could not yet speak.
Let us look closer at Table 34. It is at the top of the post. LOOK at it. Paul Wesselhoft helps here before we continue with Jonathon.
Children of Table 34
Wardell B. Pomeroy is the author of “Boys and Sex” and Girls and Sex.”  These are two so-called “children’s” books that are recommended by the American Library Association.
Pomeroy is co-author, with Alfred C. Kinsey, of “Sexual Behavior in the Human Male.”  In this book, Kinsey and Pomeroy describe their experimentation with the sexual responses of babies and children.  It is shocking to learn how these scientist experimented on young children.
Science absent of ethics is frightening.
In table 34 (page 180), these scientists reveal, what many of us to be, criminal experimentation on 28 babies and children. This was done in the name of science.
Working with the Kinsey team was Mary Calderone, medical director of the Planned Parenthood Federation of America from 1953 to 1964. She later founded the Sex Information and Educational Council of the United States
When one reads table 34 and realizes that a five month old baby was sexually stimulated to orgasms and a four year old child was sexually stimulated to multiple orgasms, a moral person knows that child sexual abuse, in the name of science, was perpetrated.
Table 34 poses at least three disturbing questions: Who are the children of Table 34?  How were they chosen for experimentation?  Where are they now?
Pomeroy and Kinsey have had a major impact on sex education in schools and probably excited and influenced a generation of pedophiles.
In “Boys and Sex” (p.162), Pomeroy says, without moral criticism, that there are “boys who build up a strong emotional attachment to a particular animal and have intercourse with it whenever possible.”
This “children’s” book is in the youth section (age 11) of our library.  Any ageed child can read or check out Pomerey’s book without parental knowledge, as well as other sexually explicit “children’s” books.  I am not referring here to any adult materials, only books that are classified as children’s books.  These so-called “children’s” books are age inappropriate.  They should not have been classified as children’s books in the first place.
There is a definite agenda and a strategic goal behind these sexually explicit “children’s” books.  
Their authors are trying to pre-sexualize minors and undermine parents authority on sex morals for their children.
They do this because they are elitist.  They consider themselves enlightened.  They want to fashion a society that has little or no sexual restraint. Unfortunately, their influence is strongly felt today; it will be felt into the future.
Back to Jonathon.  Let me pull a few pints here. You will need to wash the bad taste from your mouths.
Kinsey’s so-called research was simply a quest to justify the fact that he himself was a deeply disturbed man. Dr. Reisman writes, 
“Both of Kinsey’s most recent admiring biographers confessed he was a sadistic bi/homosexual, who seduced his male students and coerced his wife, his staff and the staff’s wives to perform for and with him in illegal pornographic films made in the family attic. 
Kinsey and his mates, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Martin and Paul Gebhard, had ‘front’ Marriages that concealed their strategies to supplant what they say as a narrow pro-creational Judeo-Christian era with a promiscuous 
anything goes’ bi/gay pedophile paradise.”
Got that? The Father of the Sexual Revolution was a sado-masochistic bi-sexual sex criminal who facilitated the sexual torture of infants and children. 
His goal was not just to engage in scientific research in order to see where the data took him, but rather, as one of his prominent biographers Michael Jones notes, to launch a crusade to undermine traditional sexual morality.
Caring, empathetic, nurturing female teacher. PERVERT.
He did so to wild success—Kinsey’s influence on sex education and law in the Western world is absolutely staggering.
Some have claimed that even though Kinsey may have been disturbed and engaged in immoral behavior, his fundamental conclusions and his data still remain accurate. 
This, too, proves blatantly false. According to Dr. Reisman:
1. [Dr. Kinsey’s team] ‘forced’ subjects to give the desired answers to their sex questions, 2. Secretly trashed three quarters of their research data, and 3. Based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds each of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. 
Moreover, so few normal women would talk to them that the Kinsey team labeled women who lived over a year with a man ‘married,’ reclassifying data on prostitutes and other unconventional women as “Susie Homemaker.”
It is crucially important that people become aware of the truth behind the Kinsey Reports.
Today’s pornified sex educators, legal experts, academics, and more disturbingly, pedophile groups such as NAMBLA pushing “inter-generational intimacy,” all use Kinsey’s work to justify their agendas and lend their causes scientific credibility.

Now I must go and find my whetstone. It is not only the fine Ales provided by my Supplier that we must drink deeply of, but prepare too for action. I shall put a fine edge on my sword.

The hedge needs trimming.

Pray for us all.




  1. Even our Churches are rife with homosexual clergy.

    The embrace of homosexuality by mainstream Christian churches (which began many decades ago) has been one of the two greatest evils of our age. It's as if Christianity simply decided to commit suicide.

    The embrace of feminism by mainstream Christian churches (which also began many decades ago) has been the other great evil.

    To a large and depressing extent mainstream Christianity is now an enemy of all that is decent and healthy.

    The question is, did the Church leaderships deliberately and consciously embrace these evils? Or were they simply too weak and too stupid to notice that they were being infiltrated by people who sought to destroy Christianity? And why did rank-and-file church members allow this to happen?

    The even bigger question is whether there is a fundamental flaw in Christianity that led to this catastrophe.

    1. The locational point about clergy was almost in passing as the thrust was about academia. No I do not see Christianity as evil because it 'harbours' (really!??) homosexuals any more than I see a ten year old as evil because he has mumps. The Church is under severe attack by evil, because it is Good. Weak and stupid? A bit harsh but then it is a human institution despite its divine initiation. Now, perhaps back to Mr Kinsey or even the modern misanthropes and perverts in our schools.

    2. No I do not see Christianity as evil because it 'harbours' (really!??) homosexuals any more than I see a ten year old as evil because he has mumps.

      The point is that Christian churches were in a position to lead the fight against the homosexual agenda and they failed to do so, or at least put up no more than a feeble resistance. I don't see Christianity as evil but I do see the church hierarchies as having done evil.

      They should have been ruthless in purging perverts from their churches, and had they done so when the rot first started they could have succeeded. The mainstream Christian churches have tolerated the evil infiltrators.

      Weakness and moral cowardice often do just as much harm as evil.

    3. We are not going to see eye to eye on this although we both have merit in our positions. I agree that the Churches have been too 'forgiving' when the trespasses of a clergyman has damaged a child. It is not for a Church to forgive willy nilly but to insist that as contrition the perpertrator must confess to the Police.

      Evil is a force. It is the enemy's force. Satan's. Of course it will be used against the Church and of course men of the Church will fall. Some will be severely wounded in their soul and others will have their soul's chance of an afterlife with God completely eradicated.

    4. I agree that the Churches have been too 'forgiving' when the trespasses of a clergyman has damaged a child.

      Actually I suspect that a very large proportion of the sexual abuse charges levelled at Catholic clergy are phony. There are enormous potential rewards for anyone making an accusation against the Church and there are also a lot of people who would make such allegations out of sheer anti-Catholic hatred.

      My concern is with homosexuals who have infiltrated the churches for the specific purpose of pushing their political agenda. There's also been a huge problem with feminists infiltrating the Anglican Church with the same goals. I don't believe that these people are Christians at all. Their religion is the social justice branch of secular humanism. They are essentially atheists. The churches have allowed this type of politically inspired infiltration to go on unchecked. Just as they allowed Marxists to infiltrate the churches a few decades ago, when Marxism was still a thin

    5. A lot to agree with. The South American Church was very heavily infiltrated. The current Pope is from that perversion of 'Liberation Theology'.

    6. The current Pope is from that perversion of 'Liberation Theology'.

      It always struck me that Liberation Theology wasn't really going to liberate anybody and it wasn't really theology!

      It's a good example of what I'm concerned about - from Liberation Theology to secularism is only a very short step and from there it's an even smaller step to out-and-out atheism.

      At the time Liberation Theology seemed modern and fashionable. The last thing we need are Christian churches obsessed with being modern and fashionable. You only have to look at the sad farce that is the Church of England to see where that leads to. The more a church tries to be relevant the more irrelevant it becomes.

    7. Liberation Theology was a highly successful ploy by marxists to infiltrate and subborn the Catholic Church in South America.

    8. Liberation Theology was a highly successful ploy by marxists to infiltrate and stubborn the Catholic Church in South America.

      The trouble started when the churches (all of them) went soft on heresy. The churches (all of them) have been infiltrated by people with political agendas and these infiltrations always follow the same pattern - twisting biblical passages to give them meanings that were clearly never intended. The strategy was to make it appear that Scripture supports modern political ideologies.

      These people should have been ruthlessly cast out as heretics. But generally speaking that didn't happen. These politically inspired heresies were allowed to survive and the heretics were allowed to pass themselves off as Christians,

  2. It's frightening that Kinsey's absurd claims were taken so seriously. Because his claims really were so clearly absurd. Obviously there were a lot of people who wanted to believe those claims. It's easy enough to understand that people who shared Kinsey's perversions wanted to believe him, but a lot of people who weren't actual perverts believed him as well.

    We live (and have lived for more than a century) in an age in which decency and normality are regarded as not merely hopelessly old-fashioned but foolish and boring and oppressive.

    What went wrong? Urbanisation was part of the problem. The rise of science as an alternative religion. Capitalism (a taste for novelty makes people better consumers). The growth of mass media. In any case even by the 1940s we'd already reached the point where a large part of the populace welcomed anything that was anti-traditional (or anti-Christian). So they welcomed Kinsey's bogus research.

    I honestly don't know how we can fight back against this. I do know that if we continue to fight defensively then we will continue to be regarded as unfashionable and uncool and we will continue to lose.

    1. Yes, a lot wanted to believe. And a lot were heavily involved in abusing children. They knew full well they were doing wrong but Cognitive Dissonance overtook them and they convinced themselves they were doing right. They had the academic power: they had financial backers. The pressure was on them to stay the course despite it being that slope down to hell.

      How do we fight? I see you fighting. I fight. Many fight. We write: we expose: we encourage Good rather than bad. Perhaps we do not do enough. Perhaps one voice here or there gets overlooked.

      But hey, The US President gave a speech today in support of 'Pro-Life', against abortion. There were several Hundred Thousand people marching.

      We are Not Alone.

    2. SAY not the struggle naught availeth,
      The labour and the wounds are vain,
      The enemy faints not, nor faileth,
      And as things have been they remain.

      If hopes were dupes, fears may be liars;
      It may be, in yon smoke conceal'd,
      Your comrades chase e'en now the fliers,
      And, but for you, possess the field.

      For while the tired waves, vainly breaking,
      Seem here no painful inch to gain,
      Far back, through creeks and inlets making,
      Comes silent, flooding in, the Main.

      And not by eastern windows only,
      When daylight comes, comes in the light;
      In front the sun climbs slow, how slowly!
      But westward, look, the land is bright!

    3. They knew full well they were doing wrong but Cognitive Dissonance overtook them and they convinced themselves they were doing right.

      Agreed. It is a sad fact that so much evil is done by people who are convinced they are doing right. In fact it's possible that just about all evil is done by people convinced they are doing right. As much as I despise Social Justice Warriors it is possible that most of them genuinely believe they are on the side of good. Even people motivated by hate think that they're motivated by love, or think that their hatred is righteous (feminists definitely fall into this category).

      Very few people wake up each morning and ask themselves, "What evil things can I do today?" Deluded people are more dangerous than evil people in some ways.

      There are of course a small number of truly evil people (politicians, Hollywood moguls, etc) although they're often amoral rather than immoral. But they could achieve little without their armies of deluded foot soldiers.

      Sexual perverts are an interesting case. I've known quite a few male homosexuals and I believe the major motivating factor behind their relentless pushing for their lifestyles to be accepted and celebrated is self-disgust. That might well be the explanation for Kinsey.


Ne meias in stragulo aut pueros circummittam.

Our Bouncer is a gentleman of muscle and guile. His patience has limits. He will check you at the door.

The Tavern gets rowdy visitors from time to time. Some are brain dead and some soul dead. They attack customers and the bar staff and piss on the carpets. Those people will not be allowed in anymore. So... Be Nice..