The guys in the P&B wondered a bit about the evil part but could see the 'shame' quite clearly. And the stupid too.
We are all old and long-enough in the tooth to recognise that young people are conformly thick, even at University, and that some have a chance to grow out of it one day.
Meanwhile the rest of the University educated become feminists, greenies, lefties and white-collar criminals. Politicians, quite often. Fewer, fortunately, take to being common o’ garden street thugs, unless in a protest march, saving whales or demanding free stuff from the taxpayer. And few are intrinsically evil. Just stupid.
Here is one such quite stupid student: Lily Patchett. She is some mum and dad’s daughter. The apple of their eye.
Pretty girl. Nice open smile.
The student magazine’s cover featured Lily.
Not the pretty face, but another small, moist, very personal and smiling part of Lily, along with a dozen or so other girls' vaginas.
Why on earth would she want a picture of her private parts on the magazine cover?
If she had texted them to someone she might have found herself in trouble. If a male as much as sends a copy to twitter or put it on Facebook, he would be in jail within a day and HE would be in the headlines.
But Lily can ‘do whatever she wants with her body’ because that’s the modern stupidity.
She is a Feminist, you see.
She still has the cradle-marks
on her bum....but she didn’t have those photographed, just her girl-bits.
Lily is a member of the Women's Collective at the University of Sydney. She was recruited to the Honi Soit project at one of the group's meetings.
Now we know what they do in a 'women's collective'. They look at one another's vagina's like little girls in the bushes.
Women can gawp at women’s vaginas but feminists say that men are beasts, depraved and potential rapists if they gawp at them too. But on a student magazine cover it is 'intellectual'.
Women can display bare vaginas (with and without 'bushes) on student magazine covers but the feminists will create havoc if a bikini-clad pudenda is on a men’s magazine cover.
“"I expected the criticism, but I can't understand it," Lily said.
"When is it going to be appropriate to show our bodies as they are, and not in some false, made-up way? Because if there is a place and time, not enough people know about it.
"The truth of the diversity and richness of our bodies is hidden from almost everyone. In 2013, I couldn't think of a more appropriate time."
Meanwhile, the reaction from Lily's friends has been overwhelmingly positive, and she has been supported well by others involved in the story.
"Jennifer Yiu (who photographed all of the vaginas featured on the cover) was very professional about the whole thing," Lily said.
What a wonderful education we provide our young people. Nice places to go each day.
Read more: http://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/lily-patchett-explains-why-she-allowed-student-newspaper-honi-soit-to-publish-a-photo-of-her-vagina/story-fnixwvgh-1226702214457#ixzz2cki0N0Hy
Still, all those old buildings have an asset value.
Fred in the bar gawped in astonishment at the news that Lily thought ‘not enough people know about’ seeing women’s private parts.
Heck, Lily. They are PRIVATE.
Isn't that the argument your feminist friend give?
Should you not be applauding Men's Magazines for educating the world about women's private bits so that the world can appreciate the 'diversity and richness'?
"Good Lord Harry NO, King Amfortas the Tavern Keeper", would come the feminist retort.
OK, they might not say Lord Harry. Harriet, as in Harman, maybe.
You see, Men's magazines often feature pictures of naked women, or beautiful girls in stunning lingerie. Sometimes, with their blokes for company.
On the other hand, on the other shelves in the newsagents', Women's magazines simply feature pictures of naked women and beautiful girls in stunning lingerie. Some, also, with their blokes for company.
But that's 'different'.
His magazines usually contain about 54 pages, 25 of which feature the naked and under-dressed women.
There will be several, incisive, 4-5 page articles from prominent people. And reader’s letters and adverts from ladies who tell popular stories on the ‘phone.
Her magazines are 'better'. They usually contain 278 pages with 137 devoted to naked women and beautiful girls in stunning lingerie.
There will be 754 visually decorative paragraphs, with lots of coloured headings, and paraphrases in bright red or mauve or blue in boxes, about clothes or celebrities, or both together, from whomsoever. And reader’s letters. Also, 400 adverts from telephonic psychic healers, tarot card readers, soothsayers, dieticians, magic charm & potion sellers and a huge range of free offers for only $49.99 post and handling.
Women look at the pictures and fantasize. Men look at the pictures and fantasize.
For some unfathomable reason, she make a lot of fuss, sometimes even cries, when he looks at his magazines.
Lily's feminist friends picket Marks and Spencers to stop the men's magazines being shown at all.
I wonder what Lily expected men and women to do seeing her vagina splashed all over the front page of a student magazine. Should Marks and Sparks display her cover, do you think?
Not only that but the fact is (Unis still deal in facts, don't they?) 50% of the world’s population have one. A vagina that is.
They can see them already but seem to want the other 50% kept in the dark.
But women are a bit funny about them.
That’s a woman’s issue, Lily.
I guess she thinks so too.
Professional photographer perverts are often women. Did she think of that, I wonder
Not that a dozen or so male private members would appear on the student magazine cover. All sorts of problems would have arisen. Ambulances would have been called: first for the victims and then for the feminist rioters.
Note too that Lily’s motivation was not simply that there was a camera handy, but that she wanted ‘other women’ to be ‘happy’ about their vaginas.
By looking at her's.
How does that work? I doubt, somehow, she would accept that from a man showing his penis. Do you?
"I want other men to be happy about their penises. So look at mine"
I just cannot hear a chap saying that, can you?
When it comes to vaginas and penises, women seem to have the strangest ideas.
‘She’ can show hers to strange gawpers but thinks ‘he’ is ‘obsessed’ with the SIZE of his penis. That's why he doesn't show it.
He is terrified of it apparently. It isn’t that he considers it private. No. He is so terrified that he barely ever lets the issue enter his mind for fear of total life disruption.
Unless in a public toilet where all he does is look, in astonishment and envy, at other men’s dicks. They, apparently, don’t mind him looking.
Every woman ‘knows’ this, ‘intuitively’,
...because he never discusses it with her.
Every other man in the world has a bigger dick.
That is, her man has the smallest of 3.2 billion dicks, including those of little boys.
No wonder he refuses to think about it, let alone talk to her about it.
He makes sure his little penis is out of sight as much a possible. It is of such shamefully small proportion that he would be arrested if he showed it in public.
Old ladies would faint; younger ones scream; dogs would howl and little girls need counseling for the next 35 years (at taxpayer expense).The law actually forbids it, as people would be traumatised.
She, charitably, cannot understand his ‘obsession’. She cares nothing for size.
“Size does not matter”
she says, nonchalantly. Why should she care?
Even despite the fact that HER man has the smallest, weenyist, most miniscule dick in the world, she doesn’t mind. She loves him.
She thinks that penis augmentation is just a silly idea.
She could not imagine being so obsessed.
Besides. She has BREASTS.
And, she has bras, that have padding.
And gels. And up-lifting under-wires.
Bras that lift, shape, separate, accentuate, minimize, maximize. Push-up, plunge, contour, control, shape, flatten.
Increase cleavage, decorate, contrast, attract.
Give illusion of ‘cup of choice’, overflowing or otherwise.
And …..silicon gel inserts at $500 per breast, along with $7500 surgical interventions that generate $ 62.8b a year of Gross Domestic Product.
She can even get a special Surgical Loan from her health fund.
Then there’s the diet industry. $145 trillion. p/a !
Why should she be concerned ?
Men and their obsession with size !!
She, even with ‘petite’ breasts,
will get her kit off at the sound of a camera being cocked,
but he won’t – ‘cause his dick’s TOO small.
Men ! Just ‘little boys’.
She wonders if ‘lovers’ have big ones.
Ah yes. That camera.
She wonders if she can get paid next time she has her vagina photographed.
Maybe a men's magazine will pay her.
Those cheapskate students !!
Lily NEEDS a drink.
Make it a stiff one.