Labels

Friday, November 17, 2017

The Yeah Horse Won.

It only takes less than 1% to win a nation, so remember that all we Christian people who say our prayers at night. Australians love to bet on the races and we have just seen one here that has been years in the running.  The gray filly 'Feministasista' came out of the turn two lengths ahead of the piebald 'Al-Mahadi'sjihadi' as they raced toward the line, and we were all taken by surprise as the rainbow coloured 'Buggerythuggery' came through the middle - after having fallen at various hurdles along the course - to cross the line ahead of the pack by a necklace.

You can be sure that the winners did not pray. They were too busy attacking those that do. The bookmakers took home much of the huge investments bet.


"Yes" shouted the 'yes' crowd which promptly showed all the lerve and tolerance expected, pouring onto the streets and painting the pub wall with crassness.

We have to respect their view, it seems. That's the democratic way.

They, though, had no respect, calumnising in their usual disgusting way, although perhaps not quite with the violence and destruction they visited on the car of a gentle lady quietly and respectfully offered a different view. 

That will come though and they will now go about wrecking whatever institutions the feminists have left standing.  And anyone who gets in their way.

What a sad day.

62% or there about voted for the sodomising of Oz.

They voted to support the less than one percent of LGBTInignogs who rode on a sheep's back. 

The great Oz public has a view which some think we should respect. 

I do not. I am not a sheep.

Pell was not handy to pelt but Abbott got headbutted, and both were depicted scandalously. Nothing will be done about that of course as the pub landlady - a lesbian - gave permission to the grafittists.

Tony Abbott had presaged something of the sort a short while back when the prayerful were thinking that such a win for the buggers and sodomisers and kiddyfiddlers was a remote and well outside chance. 
Same sex marriage debate creates new breed of activists

A few weeks back I attended two separate meetings, of different organisations, both with an interest in public life. The first had about 50 people, mostly over 60, pessimistic about the next election; the second, more than 100, mostly under 30, optimistic about their ability to make a difference.

It might not surprise you that the first was a political party local campaign launch. And here in the United States it might not surprise you either that much the livelier group comprised supporters of marriage as it has always been understood. 
But it would surprise most people in Australia, where only aged, churchy losers are supposed to reject changing the nature of marriage.

Six weeks ago, some polls had 70 per cent support for same-sex marriage. With about a week to go in Australia’s postal vote, polling by the No case shows it has fallen to about 50 per cent, with about 40 per cent opposed and 10 per cent undecided.
Polls are, of course, notoriously poor at predicting and this was not an election per se but a postal vote in a non-binding 'plebisite' Very apt name. 
In Ireland, the final poll showed just 18 per cent opposed to same-sex marriage; yet the No vote was 38 per cent (of the 62 per cent that turned out). Perhaps every one of the opponents of same-sex marriage actually voted; or perhaps No voters don’t like ’fessing up, even to pollsters. Just to get 40 per cent would be a moral victory for marriage; but my instinct is that shy No voters mean this result could swing either way.
And just shy of 40% is what we had in Oz, for retaining the traditional meaning of 'Marriage'.  
Win, lose, or draw, though, starting from scratch two months ago, the campaign for marriage in my country has mobilised thousands of new activists; and created a network that could be deployed to defend Western civilisation more broadly and the Judaeo-Christian ethic against all that has been undermining it.
I do hope that network is maintained and developed and deployed as a far better fighting force in the months and years to come. We are going to need it.  This is not a whole war but just one battle in a long, drawn out war.
So why not take notice of what He says?
So far, the campaign to defend marriage in Australia has raised more than $6 million from more than 20,000 donors, and fielded more than 5000 volunteers to doorknock and phone canvass. Even now, on an Australian weekend, more people attend religious services than play organised sport, yet sport makes you normal and religion makes you odd, if you’re ruled by the zeitgeist.

Despite the vindictiveness of the same-sex marriage campaign against anyone who breaks cover, several thousand people, mostly young, have done just that. Such robust characters, once activated, are unlikely to fade away. 
Here is the nucleus of an organisation, created almost from nothing, to rival the left-wing activist group GetUp! that has been around for a decade; and that boasts it defeated a number of conservative MPs at last year’s federal election.

In the medium term, these new activists are likely to mean the long march of the left through our institutions is no longer largely unopposed. 
And we need more standard bearers, at every level, because a majority that stays silent soon becomes a minority.
In Victoria, the left-wing Labor government has reportedly given LGBTI support groups $500,000 to counsel people distressed by the same-sex marriage plebiscite. In that state, parents must sign a special form if their children are to receive religious instruction at school — but it must be at lunch time or before or after class and limited to 30 minutes a week. 
From next year, something called Safe Schools will be compulsory for all secondary students in Victorian government schools. This is a social engineering program that managed to trick its way into the curriculum disguised as anti-bullying, where 12-year-olds are made to role-play being gay and are taught that there’s really no such thing as being male or female.

The Victorian government is also on the verge of giving doctors the right to kill some patients; a moral watershed that has crept up on us, in part because marriage has preoccupied the national debate.

There is a massive job for these newly energised, potential conservative activists that I saw the other night. 
Regardless of the same-sex result, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience and the right of parents to choose for their children need to be reasserted because the marriage campaign has helped to illustrate just how fragile they are.

Merely debating marriage has hinted at the risks facing cultural conservatives, the new dissidents in the world that their decency and tolerance has made possible. 
The Catholic Archbishop of Hobart, for example, has faced prosecution under anti-discrimination laws for a booklet outlining the orthodox Christian teaching on marriage. The threat of protest has caused pro-marriage meetings and rallies to be cancelled. 
A Christian teenager was sacked for putting a pro-marriage message on her Facebook page (and naturally the Australian Human Rights Commission declined to defend her). 
Parents have been lied to on gender-fluidity programs in their children’s schools. 
And these depredations have taken place while the same-sex activists are yet to win!
Now, of course, they have won, so expect far more of that. 
As the ('Australian') newspaper’s Paul Kelly points out, along with former prime minister John Howard: the idea that you can change the understanding of something as fundamental as marriage without changing anything else is an “intellectual fraud”. 
Especially if unaccompanied by any wider charter of freedoms, we can expect same-sex marriage in Australia to have much the same consequences as in other countries. People will take offence at the traditional teaching and the anti-discrimination laws can be relied on to do the rest.

Campaigns for same-sex marriage and the like are a consequence of our civilisational self-doubt and the collapse of cultural self-confidence. 
The decline of belief has meant a reluctance to assert principles and a fear of giving offence. In the meantime, there are three million Australians who haven’t voted and we’re fighting to get them all because, yes or no, everyone should have a say; one way or another, the result will be easier to accept the more closely it reflects the judgment of us all.
I will not accept it anymore than I will accept any unjust, immoral law. 

We must gear up, as Tony says, with this newly minted force of the Old and the Faithful, and find the battlefields to fight upon. I suggest 'defending' those who become embroiled in false charges and incidents incited by the buggers who want the florist and the baker and the Priest to serve their 'wedding needs'.

For, believe me,
Something Wicked This Way Comes.

A Beast lumbers its way into this fair land. And the SSM brigade is just one battalion, along with the Feminist Battalions, coming in ahead of the Anti-Christ.

Those battalions sounded their trumpets a long time ago. We took no notice.

As a customer, Truthphobes, said from the back of the room:
Surprising that 62% of Australians voted in support of the political agenda of the left, either by choice or from being naïve.?

YES it is Sad Day for Australia as homosexuals cheer and Cultural Marxists smile, having landed a huge blow on the institution of the family.

We will find out soon if it was just about “love” as the YES Campaign advocated. As fairies don't live in the garden we can expect the immoral Cultural Marxist “Safe Schools” Program will be rolled out across the nation, corrupting children through the education system in the near future. Plus a lot more, as evidenced from overseas  after nations succumbed to same sex marriage. 

With decades of planning and advocating the left have won and won well. 
We can only hope that Liberalists and Conservatives who care for democracy awaken to the creep of Cultural Marxism.

100 years of Communism, 100 million deaths. It is time Australians learnt more on Cultural Marxism / Post Modernism (Communism with a different label and strategy)

Some will claim “fear mongering” or “conspiracy theory” to what has been written. Who would have thought back in 1984 when homosexuality was illegal, that such a culture change would happen. Worth learning about Cultural Marxist Critical Theory.
Worth learning a little about the 'Wages of Sin' too.

Now, a final word. A 'Reality Check.


Polish the armour, folks. Introduce the sword to the whetstone. 

Battle has decended upon us, like it or not.

It will not end well, so drink up while you can.

Pax 


7 comments:

  1. Regardless of the same-sex result, freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience and the right of parents to choose for their children need to be reasserted because the marriage campaign has helped to illustrate just how fragile they are.

    There's a certain confusion there. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of conscience - these are liberal ideals and they are fundamentally anti-Christian.

    We can only hope that Liberalists and Conservatives who care for democracy awaken to the creep of Cultural Marxism.

    Democracy, another liberal ideal.

    This is why Christians and conservatives always lose. They have internalised so many liberal ideals. They have already accepted 90 percent of the liberal agenda.

    Most of those who today claim to be conservatives are in fact fighting for liberal principles.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I do not see those 'freedom' concepts as anti-Christian.

      Delete
    2. I do not see those 'freedom' concepts as anti-Christian.

      The purpose of those freedom concepts was to encourage scepticism and to undermine faith in legitimate authority. To undermine faith in traditional beliefs and values. To create a climate of moral, spiritual and intellectual relativism. Once those purposes were achieved the decline of Christianity was inevitable.

      Christianity was still a major force in Europe in the 17th century. By the time the Enlightenment had done its work over the course of the 18th century Christianity had ceased to be a significant factor in Europe. Christianity had been marginalised, turned into just another private belief of no political consequence.

      Liberalism was from the first an alternative belief system intended to displace Christianity. The contest between liberalism and Christianity was always going to be a war to the death. They are incompatible belief systems.

      The Bible doesn't say that we have the freedom to ignore the Ten Commandments if we don't like them. It doesn't say that we can always change the Ten Commandments by having a popular vote. I don't think it says that we have the freedom to worship golden calves if we want to. Or sacrifice to pagan gods if we feel like it.

      Freedom leads to anarchy, to confusion, and ultimately and inevitably to atheism.

      Pope Pius IX understood that there could be no compromise with liberalism. Unfortunately mainstream Christianity decided that it could compromise with liberalism. That's why we now live in a post-Christian society.

      Delete
  2. You really make it seem so easy together with your presentation but I find this matter to be really one
    thing that I feel I would never understand. It kind of feels too complex and very huge
    for me. I'm having a look ahead in your subsequent submit, I will try to get the cling of
    it!

    ReplyDelete
  3. It’s not just the inmates who have taken over the asylum, it’s the sickos.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Aided and abetted by the riff-raff and many of the hoity-toity.

      Delete
  4. Woah! I'm really enjoying the template/theme of this site.
    It's simple, yet effective. A lot of times it's very difficult to
    get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and appearance.
    I must say you have done a superb job with this.
    Also, the blog loads very fast for me on Chrome. Outstanding Blog!

    ReplyDelete

Ne meias in stragulo aut pueros circummittam.

Our Bouncer is a gentleman of muscle and guile. His patience has limits. He will check you at the door.

The Tavern gets rowdy visitors from time to time. Some are brain dead and some soul dead. They attack customers and the bar staff and piss on the carpets. Those people will not be allowed in anymore. So... Be Nice..