Labels

Saturday, October 3, 2015

Arse Over Tit.

Old vernacular makes its way into conversations in the bars quite frequently. I try to keep a lid on it generally, but we have to face the fact that so many things have been the same for eons that well-repeated 'short-form' phrases, often quite humourous, become 'normal' and understood.

Tumbling 'head over heels' is polite-form, but 'arse over tit' more commonplace.

Slippery slope is another 'polite-form' and it is another oft used phrase here. Our society is on one.  And what happens when you get to the bottom of the slope? You go arse over tit, that's what happens. Have we reached the bottom, yet? 

The more mathematically inclined talk of 'tipping points'. That's when a trend goes arse over tit. Chaos occurs: reversals: tumbling. Limbs everywhere and the whole is subject to gravity and whatever is about to be landed upon. It is usually painful.

It is all too often unexpected. Unplanned. 


But we have seen our society on the slide and know full well what will happen. 
People have shouted warnings. 
And they have been shouted down for their efforts. 
Villified, ostracised, ridiculed and persecuted.

Go back a few decades and the western civil world was quite different. It had Morals; it had standards; it had 'unwritten understandings'.  Sure, they were not always looked upon with smiles and acceptance. Some were difficult. Some were resisted, like a small child not wanting to go to bed or take medicine. 

A small minority of perverts were always around to push the limits of decency and decorum. There will always be perverts.

But it seems they are no longer in the minority. 

Warning were being shouted way back then.

The old and normal order is going 'topsy-turvey'. 

Just look at Oz in this past week.

A man who wants to show what he has found out about the baby-murdering and body-part selling Abortion industry in America is arrested the moment he sets foot in Oz. 


He is a 'Risk'. 

No, Ben Carson isn't the 'risk'. Troy Newman was the chap.
Lies are told about him to a Government Minister who then bans him from entering the country let alone speak at the meetings planned. The liars say he is 'violent'.

And who has said that he is violent?



Yes, those people say he is. The woman with the finger is also an MP. Socialist. Of course.

The violent denounce the non-violent as being violent !

And are believed !!

They are not seen as a 'risk', let alone a Risk, as they go rampaging, screaming, spitting, throwing things at normal mums and dads and children.

Arse over Tit.

Free speech is OK on our streets for rabid mobs who demand the death of children and even for foreigners demanding that people be beheaded for 'insulting' some old paedophile, murdering psychopath who has been dead for 1400 years; but not for a calm, reasoned man with a suitcase full of evidence to present in a public forum in a country supposedly honouring Freedom of Speech.

For thousands of years across numerous societies, Marriage has been a perfectly acceptible 'norm'. No one questioned it a until few decades ago. Every politician with an aspiration to get into the legislature appealed to married people. Until just three years ago every political leader in Oz supported marriage.

Suddenly, within a few short years, they are almost all now in favour of the destruction of marriage and the introduction of socially-santioned buggery. Equal to Marriage !!! 

A Churchman (my courageous local Archbishop as a matter of fact) stands and tells his flock that Marriage is a 'Good' thing. As his fellows have done  for 2000 years. As study after study shows, especially for children. A matter that everyone and his dog has taken for granted since time before time.

Now he is in Court, for goodness sake. 

Hauled in by the Powers that Be on the say so of a raving bigot 'transexual' pretending to be a 'victim' in a game of 'Let's You and Him Fight'.



Arse over Tit.

Divorce was frowned upon ( but discretely tolerated) for generation after generation. Entire national histories have turned on Divorce. Entire national histories have been cemented by Marriage. 

Suddenly, in the 70's,  divorce was not just 'made legal' but made so easy as to be a promotion. No discussion took place. 'No Fault' was the mantra, as it put a target on the back of every man and handed a shotgun to every woman to use at whim.

Children were to be 'protected'. 'Family Courts' sprang up like weeds to ensure 'The Best Interests of the Children'.

Look how that has turned out. The rate of fatherless children has rocketed, with all the societal problems arising from lack of discipline and role modelling.

Warning were shouted. And shouted down.

Arse over Tit.

The homosexuals were and are less than 2% of society. In the distant past they were deemed 'beyond the pale'. Laws were against them. Then the laws were 'relaxed'.  Their sexual disorder was previously recognised as a disorder and written into the DSM:  then it was written out. Without discussion. 

'Slippery slope' cried the intelligent folk. 

SHADDAP YA FACE, came the reply from the intelligentia.

The Universities became riven with 'queer studies' along the lines of their gatekeepers' with their Feminist Studies and 'Wimmins' Studies.

Arse over Tit.

But slippery slope it is and we are falling off the end of it.

And the main target of villification? 

"Give in to homosexuals and the Paedophiles will be clamouring for acceptance next", shouted those who could see it coming.


SHADDAP YA FACE, came the reply from the intelligentia, the feminists and the queers.

Take a look. Ashely Edwardson was brought into the P&B by Colonel Allen West to tell us.
Pedophiles now seek acceptance 
We’re on a roll folks, towards the complete destruction of decency in our society. You know it, I know it, and so does a group of people – pedophiles — who, for the first time ever, sees some light at the end of their tunnel. 
We’re warning you now, get ready for an assault on children.
Pedophiles have been waiting in the shadows for some time and are, I fear, about to launch a campaign to become the next “victims” of an oppressive and mean-spirited society and demand their right to assault children.
And why shouldn’t they? After all, this practice seems to have acceptance in other parts of the world. Our own U.S. military is being told to the turn the other way when they see children being raped – just ask former Green Beret Charles Martland, who was summarily fired for standing up to a pedophile rapist and shoving him to the ground.
If you recall, we mentioned this shortly after the Supreme Court ruled on same-sex marriage, that pedophiles would be the next group to seek “acceptance.”
But the campaign for acceptance was started years ago. In 2011, an article in the Northern Colorado Gazette said “using the same tactics used by “gay” rights activists, pedophiles have begun to seek similar status arguing their desire for children is a sexual orientation no different than heterosexual or homosexuals.
In fact, in 1998 The American Psychiatric Association issued a report claiming “that the ‘negative potential’ of adult sex with children was ‘overstated’ and that ‘the vast majority of both men and women reported no negative sexual effects from childhood sexual abuse experiences.”
As Mandy would say: "Well they would say that, wouldn't they". 
And just last month, Salon.com published an op-ed from a man named Todd Nickerson, a moderator for the Virtuous Pedophile  (sic) forum, who writes “I’m a pedophile, but not a monster.” Of course Nickerson starts out as the victim, as he was born without his right hand and his prosthesis was intimidating to other children. He was “shy, uncoordinated and terrible at sports” on top of which he struggled with bladder control.
“There are still holdouts,” he writes, “people who believe that pedophilic feelings should be crammed down into the most subterranean recesses of ourselves, never to be discussed in the open, but these folks are going the way of the dodo bird. Anyway, we’ve tried that. Take it from someone who has firsthand experience: it not only doesn’t work, it tends to make things far worse. Please repeat this mantra to yourself: a repressed, unhappy pedophile is a pedophile at risk.”
So remember folks, if you continue to repress pedophiles, what they do to your children is YOUR fault. And by the way, they’re just sad victims really who deserve our acceptance and approval.
“Those individuals who have the courage to come forward and lay claim to this affliction with the understanding that they only want to use their pedo powers (you mean like Spiderman?) for good should be commended, not hated and feared.
So, please, be understanding and supportive. It’s really all we ask of you. Treat us like people with a massive handicap we must overcome, not as a monster. If we are going to make it in the world without offending, we need your help.”
Yes folks, please be understanding and supportive as you watch the moral foundations of our society crumble in pieces before your very eyes.
EVERY behavior must be accepted. EVERY iteration of gender is “normal.” EVERY form of self-expression is celebrated and elevated (unless it’s patriotism, of course). We have lost our moral compass and this great ship will soon run aground unless we make a very big shift, very soon.
 Do you think this is OTT ? Join the wreckers if you do.

It is a clear statement of what IS going to happen. 

It IS happening now.

We have a public official supposedly looking after our 'Freedoms' and stopping 'Discrimination' and supporting 'Human Rights', who actually see Oz as being further down the depravity sink than Saudi Arabia. Professor Trigg ( a feminist and socialist, of course) thinks that our holding illegal faux-refugees in hotels is somehow wicked and she actually thinks we should behave better (?) or we will not get the 'seat at the trough' that the Saudis have.

Hello.
Saudis are a nation of paedophiles. 
They revere a paedophile. Mohammed. 

Muslims are a very odd 'enemy' in the west. On the one hand we have 'anti-terrorism' laws being made every other day, but no-one is allowed to mention just who the terrorists are.

They are MUSLIMS.

Paedophile, rapists, murderous Muslims.

A shooting the other day in America. The gunman, a convert to Islam, asked each person before he shot them if they were Christians. Answer yes and be  shot dead. 

Heroic Christians said 'YES'.

The Media and the President do not mention this very salient fact.

A shooting in Sydney yesterday: the media will not report that the shooter was Muslim.

Arse over Tit.

And what if someone actually tries to stop a paedophile attacking and sexually assaulting a child?

Do you think for a moment that, as he would have been yesterday, he would be seen as a Hero?

Sorry. We are well into Arse over Tit territory.

Rick Wells told us of a General's response to a US Army event.
Gen Boykin – Soldier Being Discharged For Beating Afghan Child Rapist Is A Hero – 
American Military Leadership Is Perverted

The pervert that is squatting in the White House is doing his best to taint all of American society in his own image. 
Apparently forced homosexual rape is fine with Obama in spite of his claims in a UN speech just made yesterday in which he condemned “cultural excuses” for abuses. Assaults on women, homosexuals and against people because of their religion were named specifically by Hussein Obama in his speech.

The boy that Sergeant Charles Maitland was defending didn’t fall into any of those groups, in fact, he was being abused by a homosexual Muslim official, so it is the perpetrator of the horrific crime that is receiving Obama protection, not the victim. 
Maybe Bathhouse Barry doesn’t consider homosexual rape to be a crime at all; something more along the lines of an initiation in his social reengineering of American society.

Obama declared in that speech “I do not have patience for the excuse of ‘well, we have our own way of doing things,’” when it comes to abuse and discrimination. Apparently, he and our military leadership have patience with little boys being kept chained to a bed and sodomized. 
It’s not the kind of “way of doing things” that he’s run out of patience with. He’ll protect and encourage that type of deviant behavior with and within our military. 
His selection of homosexual Eric Fanning to be Secretary of the Army is indicative of just how committed to the homosexual/sexual deviant agenda his is.

General Jerry Boykin has found himself out of patience with a regime that is destroying the fabric of our nation and our military, promoting deviance while simultaneously punishing righteous behavior.

Boykin opposes the actions being taken against Sergeant Maitland, saying, “He should be held up as a hero; this is a man who took action when action needed to be taken.”
Regarding the instructing of military personnel to look the other way based upon the supposed culture of homosexuality and rape, Boykin said, “I’ve never heard of anything any more disgusting with regards to our military. I’ll tell you what, the commanders that are responsible for allowing a policy like this to be implemented, those commanders who are responsible for troops that they are telling to ignore the screams of a child that’s being sexually abused should be held accountable.
He continues, “As far as I am concerned, there’s not a commander that is aware of this that is worth being called a commissioned officer in the United States Army. They should be punished for allowing this kind of thing to go on from my perspective.”
Boykin asks, “What does it mean to be an American anymore?” We’re creating the environment which allows this perverted behavior to exist. He says it’s an erroneous claim that we don’t bring our values to the fight, that that is “exactly what we should be doing.”
He points out the destructive influence allowing such barbarism has upon morale and offers recommendation for the public to take action, beginning with contacting their members of Congress, particularly those on the Armed Services Committee. He urges people to demand that “the chain of command of the US military be held accountable for this kind of nonsense” and furthermore demand that Maitland be allowed to remain in the military.
When the Institution most often associated with Virtue and Honour permits such deviant behaviour and turns a blind eye, you know that society has turned.....


ARSE OVER TIT. 

Perhaps the ending words and ideas and strategies can be summarised by Andrew Klaven. He usually puts things succinctly. Mind you he is confining himself here just to the 'Muslim' issue. Its a start to an ending.



Folks, there is WORSE to come.

The PAIN is coming.

So drink deep of Grace.

Get thee to the Sacraments.


Pax.







12 comments:

  1. The woman with the finger is also an MP. Socialist. Of course.

    And there it is. And yes, the pain is coming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The pain will go to the depths of our souls. The real danger is in our own failure.

      Delete
  2. You sum up very well, my friend. It has been a long time coming and it has come suddenly. We need to concentrate on building our faith, hope and charity and courage and wisdom. As never before in history, I believe, evil is out, loud, proud and utterly living up to its title of the Prince of this World. We must be prepared to be crucified and offer our sufferings for the salvation of sinners. Do you feel that the end is not far off?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. 'The End' comes really quite frequently, Maryse. Recall history, even quite recent: the French Revolution: the two World Wars. Total horror and far more widespread and physically devastating in material and bodily forms. Each was an assault on the spirit as well as the material world. We weathered those storms.

      This current phase has come along 'seductively'. It has taken individuals into the depths of personal, widespread depravity rather than having it 'visited' upon them. It has attacked the 'very best' that our civilisation brought forth.... freedom, truth, even science, law, education, health.

      It certainly is 'Personal' and the response to it has to be too.

      Yes, we have the tools both spiritual and mental. We must use them. Read my last line and think on it. There are so many Christians, fine people, good people, who will fail the test because they reject the Sacraments. Many take a simulacrum which is not 'authentic' It does not have the Holy infused. My poor ale and wine is just ale and wine, despite being from my Supplier. But it does draw attention. It requires 'energising' in the Crypt wherin the Holy Grail sits. (We each have a key to our own Crypt). Go to Mass: take Holy Communion; go to Confession. Hope that Extreme Unction is at hand at your end. For we will all have an end.

      Delete
    2. There is always an end and a new beginning until we find the key to 'our Crypt'. Finding the key leads us to our supplier. Knowing our supplier is our soul purpose...

      Finding the key and 'knowing' needs a great deal of effort on the part of an individual soul.

      Delete
  3. I'm so glad someone else noticed how much poor Tim Tebow has gotten shafted, he's such a talented quarterback, and though he has really done very well in his trials, he is always cut from the teams preseason inexplicably every time - the only reason that could possibly be is his faith because even those teams have said they like him as a person and don't ever really give a plausible explanation for cutting him.

    What is so ironic about it is that Tim is such a positive person, an encourager and a leader, he is NOT a condemning, judgy-judgy Pharisee type kind of Christian, and though he credits God for his successes, he doesn't "get political" unless he's asked. It's like he's become the whipping post for the types of Christians who are condemning and judgmental, it really is unfair.

    For all the liberal talk of seeing people as individuals first, people definitely cannot "see" Tim Tebow as an individual first, can they?

    Considering all the trouble in NFL this past year, you would think they'd want someone like Tim to improve their image, but I guess they prefer crooks, druggies and repeat violent-crime offenders as the "new face of the NFL?"

    As for Caitlyn Jenner, same rule applies - I can see Caitlin as individual separate from all transsexuals and I don't have to like her just because she's a transsexual, and I don't think that's likely to change just because she's in my face every two seconds.

    Because I don't think she's particularly "brave", as there are many poor, nonfamous transsexuals who aren't treated nearly as well by society as Caitlyn, who can't afford as much security or positive PR.

    And if anyone saw his/her "transition" episode, he/she said, "It's time for me to do something nice for others instead of just me."

    Oh really, Caitlin? You are 65 years old and you just now thought about doing something for others instead of yourself? And legitimate transsexuality or not, you think that publicly upturning a family and feeding more drama to their reality-show self-obsession is in any way unselfish?

    Having said that, and many may disagree with me on this part - I don't think his/her behavior is the result of "liberal immorality" because he still identifies as a Republican?

    I think his/her confusion is the result of constant fame, attention, power and money, having been infected with the Kardashian disease - and the last time I checked, the sins of greed and selfishness weren't exclusive to the left or right and God was not a Republican nor a Democrat :)

    (PS - Forgive me, Lord, for judging Caitlyn on the sin of greed and selfishness, since we all sin and fall short of the glory of God, but it really bothers me your son preached so much on greed but it is the sin most ignored. I'll work on that?:)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A lot there, Chrystal and quite focused. The small illustration showing Tim and Bruce was as an indication of how 'something' has taken a fine religious sense - Christianity - which was held and admired by the majority and for the majority, and replaced it with a narcissistic and quite deviant (from the norm) minority sexual non-religious sense. I can't say I see much difference between a football player and a TV nonebrity, m'self but it is clear just why Tim has fallen out of favour.

      Delete
    2. Thank you, perhaps the reason for the better focus is I'm not yet working so I don't have to multitask while commenting;)

      It may be a small illustration, but it's a big point - one I agree with 100%. It's also proof that society promotes based on politics, these days, rather than qualifications for a job. (I've seen that happen both ways, here in the South.)

      In fact, I haven't decided, but I may write a post on this subject and link to this post, would that be all right? If not, that's okay, it's just when I'm inspired by someone else's post, I feel they should be credited ;)

      Delete
    3. I will be pleased to read your post on the matter and yes, by all means link to this one if it is relevant. I always provide a link to others when I quote them.

      Delete
  4. PS - I mentioned Democrat or Republican because these are American celebrities mentioned ;)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That too, m'dear. Your favourite tipple on the bar.

      Delete

Ne meias in stragulo aut pueros circummittam.

Our Bouncer is a gentleman of muscle and guile. His patience has limits. He will check you at the door.

The Tavern gets rowdy visitors from time to time. Some are brain dead and some soul dead. They attack customers and the bar staff and piss on the carpets. Those people will not be allowed in anymore. So... Be Nice..