tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post1208002949007759340..comments2023-09-06T22:30:02.061+10:00Comments on The Knight & Drummer: Truth & Good Manners 1 : Feminists & Manginas 0.Amfortashttp://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-13420639665944902662017-06-29T11:04:51.517+10:002017-06-29T11:04:51.517+10:00I did recognise above the difference between the s...I did recognise above the difference between the sexes. And I didn't accuse you of being unkind, so please don't take it personally. You are quite right in most of what you say and I mearely clarify around the edges. The men trying to be women and vice versa is as daft and destructive as you suppose. They both end up inferior to what their nature aspired And yes women are far behind in achieving scientific accalim. But do you not see the point I was making? It only takes one example to the contrary to counter a blanket claim. That is what I was doing.Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-77629015603246548462017-06-29T11:02:42.734+10:002017-06-29T11:02:42.734+10:00I am having a bit of a giggle with regards to this...I am having a bit of a giggle with regards to this comments thread :-)<br /><br />Women are a species? I think not... It takes a male and female to be a species!<br /><br />And where do I start on dfordooms comment... He has fallen for a male/female stereotype, which does not exist. I could introduce him to several men who always bring the discussion back to themselves and how they feel personally.<br /><br />Perhaps we should not allow self centred people (male of female) to vote?<br /> <br />This type of thinking leads to authoritarianism... A place where we don't want to be!CherryPiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11788084724907992076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-12606392330314491112017-06-29T02:14:29.274+10:002017-06-29T02:14:29.274+10:00Vote? Women should not? I would not give 90% of me...<em>Vote? Women should not? I would not give 90% of men the vote either.</em><br /><br />Actually I wouldn't give anybody the vote since I think democracy is a dangerously bad idea. If 90% of men are unfit to vote then democracy is emphatically not a good idea.<br /><br />It doesn't really matter though since democracy is an idea that seems to be on the way out.dfordoomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02306293859869179118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-9095953911752618882017-06-29T02:07:24.843+10:002017-06-29T02:07:24.843+10:00Be kind. At least.
There's nothing unkind abo...<em>Be kind. At least.</em><br /><br />There's nothing unkind about recognising that the sexes are different. In fact what's unkind is what our society is doing in encouraging women to want to be men. They end up being inferior men. Just as men who try to be women end up being inferior women. We cannot be happy unless we accept the way we were born. I'd like women to be happy, just as I'd like men to be happy. It saddens me that women today are so often unhappy, angry and bitter.<br /><br /><em>Marie Curie for example?</em><br /><br />The reason that everybody mentions Marie Curie when this subject comes up is that it is so very very rare for a woman to be a high achiever in physics. What is significant is not that Marie Curie achieved eminence in this field, but rather that she is almost alone in doing so. Which sort of proves my point.dfordoomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02306293859869179118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-45664184264316679342017-06-29T01:38:55.485+10:002017-06-29T01:38:55.485+10:00Hmmmm. Let us look at what you say. Men, in the ma...Hmmmm. Let us look at what you say. Men, in the main, are not rational creatures. Rationality is a higher order function rarely apparant until past teen years even in males. Even then many men simply do not attain it.<br /><br />"Women judge everything on an emotional basis." All human beings do. Emotion is at the base of even rationality. We value rationality. Value is determined by want, desire. That is emotion. <br /><br />Both men and women 'fall for marxism' on emotional grounds. They desire things that others have. Very few men have even a skerrick of 'intellectual appeal'. Even the so-called intellectual's own environment - the Universities and science labs - are full of men who show barely an intellectual neuron at work. Just look at the climate industry, the medical, the administration of universities. They are dominated by half-wits. Men in the main. <br /><br />"Women are highly intelligent in a distinctively female way". Really? Marie Curie for example? Or perhaps you will offer examples of your experience. Intellect and intelligence and rationality are quite different faculties.<br /><br />Logical reasoning is rare. Very few men in my experience could write a logic truth table. Very few women either. <br /><br />Now, I would not disagree with you 'in the main' were you to define terms and provide examples and proved you were right. But blanket dismissals are poor rationality. <br /><br />Vote? Women should not? I would not give 90% of men the vote either. I am a King. Democracy is a default system, there being few shown to be better, but it empowers half-wits of both genders. One half-wit King can be assassinated and replaced. That is hard to do with 20 million or more half-wits all seeking a say. Not that they do, of course. They simply elect a half wit as a representative who will go right ahead and ignore what the electing half-wit wants anyway.<br /><br />Let us, as individual men, look to our own rationality and logic and emotion, and our personal agency. Controlling ourselves is difficult enough without wasting time and effort giving or taking control from 7 billion others. <br /><br />The human condition is tough. We are surrounded by people as dim as we are. Be kind. At least. Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-75623300589389139882017-06-29T01:02:24.635+10:002017-06-29T01:02:24.635+10:00Keep Hope and a discerning eye open Dfor. You may ...<em>Keep Hope and a discerning eye open Dfor. You may see some fine women about whose differences - even in grasping and using reason - can be a delight.</em><br /><br />I have nothing whatever against women. They just aren't rational creatures. Female intelligence is so radically different from male intelligence. <br /><br />Women personalise everything. Everything. If you try to discuss anything with a woman in general terms she'll bring the discussion back to herself. Every single time. That's why we must never give women the vote or allow women to hold political office. They can only judge things according to how those things affect them personally and how those things make them feel personally.<br /><br />Women judge everything on an emotional basis. Everything. Men of course can be just as deluded but men tend to get deluded on intellectual grounds while women get deluded on emotional grounds. Men fall for marxism because of its intellectual appeal. Women fall for cultural marxism because of its emotional appeal.<br /><br />It doesn't mean women are inferior to men intellectually. They're just very very very different. In a society in which men and women occupy traditional sex roles that very different female intelligence becomes an asset. Women are superb at understanding complex emotional relationships. Female intelligence only becomes a liability when women try to become men. Men and women are supposed to be fundamentally different.<br /><br />The smart women are the ones who realise they're not men and can never be men. There are highly intelligent women but they're highly intelligent in a distinctively female way.<br /><br />Not all women are like that. But 99% of women are. As long as we don't give them the vote it won't be a problem.dfordoomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02306293859869179118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-76804034087208076092017-06-28T23:25:10.840+10:002017-06-28T23:25:10.840+10:00Hmmmmm. The old phrase comes to mind. "Not al...Hmmmmm. The old phrase comes to mind. "Not all woman are like that". Cassie Jaye herself is an example of a feminist who 'changed her mind'. In my experience most women are complex, just like men are, but very slightly differently. The sexes do differ. The grasp that some men (many??) have on reason is tenuous at best. Try talking reason with a lefty man or a muslim man. Even philosophers of note struggle to reason their way through some very basic matters. Keep Hope and a discerning eye open Dfor. You may see some fine women about whose differences - even in grasping and using reason - can be a delight. Feminists? Yes, keep a sword at hand, but first offer kindness. You are the one in charge of your responses.Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-13639307264503769622017-06-28T18:45:06.923+10:002017-06-28T18:45:06.923+10:00Anyone left will see any criticism as misogyny
Wo...<em>Anyone left will see any criticism as misogyny</em><br /><br />Women see any criticism, no matter how mild, as a personal attack undoubtedly motivated by hate. It's the way they're wired. That's why there's no possible way to reason with a feminist. Reason is not in their repertoire. It's something men never really understand or accept about women, and it's why men have allowed themselves to be crushed under the feminist jackboot. Men still go on deluding themselves that they can defend themselves by appealing to reason.dfordoomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02306293859869179118noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-82329880055860280962017-06-21T11:17:43.247+10:002017-06-21T11:17:43.247+10:00Confidential conversations in the bar are conducte...Confidential conversations in the bar are conducted furtively in low voices in dark corners. The ones here are in the open bar for all to hear. If quoting, make sure you quote the person. Some of the posts are me talking, and some, other people.Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-25782407819851083332017-06-21T06:45:05.200+10:002017-06-21T06:45:05.200+10:00Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as l...Do you mind if I quote a few of your articles as long as I provide credit and sources <br />back to your webpage? My blog site is in the exact same niche as <br />yours and my visitors would truly benefit from some of the information you provide here.<br />Please let me know if this alright with you. Thank you!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-31135849201241682982017-06-17T17:54:14.011+10:002017-06-17T17:54:14.011+10:00Yes.Yes.James Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-81273418118103069512017-06-16T16:33:19.722+10:002017-06-16T16:33:19.722+10:00Yes, many people leap to the 'hatred' labe...Yes, many people leap to the 'hatred' label with hasty ease. They just do not get the distinction 'twix person and action. Nor do they allow for change of view. Life and experience, when attended to with integrity, can bring about changes in a person and in their behaviours. Drink deep of Grace and become graceful.Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-32754050007445431662017-06-16T15:44:20.566+10:002017-06-16T15:44:20.566+10:00"has accused Jaye of tacitly condoning misogy..."has accused Jaye of tacitly condoning misogyny. Certainly, the men’s rights movement has its share of such offenders"<br /><br />Fine line. Anyone left will see any criticism as misogyny, then there are the standard observations women make about men's behaviour and vice-versa, which is more under the heading of banter.<br /><br />But to be genuine misogyny, then the man must genuinely hate women as a species- that's difficult to say when as much of it can be resentment over things which have happened. And I know women who detest women as a species.James Highamhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14525082702330365464noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-56805046161085454062017-06-15T18:33:57.494+10:002017-06-15T18:33:57.494+10:00Bolt is respectful in his presentations and questi...Bolt is respectful in his presentations and questioning, even when talking with lowlifes. That is why he is dismissed by the TV companies so much. He gave Cassie a fair hearing and allowed proper answers.Amfortashttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07474382097575605017noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-776872662073607566.post-71936301550679735452017-06-15T15:00:40.544+10:002017-06-15T15:00:40.544+10:00The good interviewer was Andrew BoltThe good interviewer was Andrew BoltHopefulauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17408698118318261867noreply@blogger.com